《杀死一只知更鸟纪念版》读书笔记

《杀死一只知更鸟纪念版》读书笔记（精选10篇）

《杀死一只知更鸟纪念版》读书笔记 第1篇

回忆读完这本书后最初的感觉，我发现那是一种温暖，心里感到十分欣慰。当斯库特牵着阿瑟的手缓缓走过夜幕下的前廊时，我看到了这个小女孩的成长。从与哥哥、朋友频繁地谋划攻击“怪人”，到体贴、爱护他，个中缘由，我想不仅仅是出于阿瑟拯救哥哥于尖刀之下，这还与父亲对她的教导息息相关。

《杀死一只知更鸟》是美国作家哈珀·李的一部长篇小说。书中讲述的是经济大萧条时期一个律师家庭里两个孩子的成长故事。全书以小少女斯库特作为第一人称，借助她的视角，给读者讲述了一系列平凡却又震撼人心的故事。书共分为两个部分，前一部分讲述语调较为缓和，给我们展现出不同生活方式的人们共同生活在同一小镇里的画面；到了第二部分，小说中的各种矛盾就涌现出来，孩子们在这些矛盾中思考、愤恨，也在长大。

书的扉页印有一句话：“律师也曾是孩子。”不难读出，这句话里的这个律师一定是值得肯定的人物；而律师也曾是孩子，就不免叫人思考，从孩子到律师，到这样一个值得人们称赞的人物，他需要经历什么样的教育？从书中的这个律师对他孩子的教育，我们便可窥之一二。

书中的律师叫做阿迪克斯，是主人公斯库特的父亲。都说在每个孩子小的时候，父亲绝对是他们的偶像，在这个家庭里也不例外。“当我们争执不下时，我们就去找阿迪克斯。”而这位律师父亲都会告诉孩子们些什么呢，是严厉的教导，还是苦口婆心地讲述大道理？可能这个父亲有点不一样，在我的印象里，他从来都是孩子们的大朋友，听孩子抱怨，与他们一同看报。

阿迪克斯很开明，他能够包容其他父亲无法包容的事情。他允许斯库特光着脚丫子和哥哥朋友四处玩耍，允许孩子陪他读报到很晚了还不去睡觉，甚至孩子们对他的日常称呼往往是直呼其名他也并不会生气。但是他并不纵容孩子，他不允许斯库特总在学校里和同学们打架，也不允许他们做出任何侮辱“怪人”拉德利的`事。

阿迪克斯总是很睿智，在处理孩子们的问题时尤为体现。他通过私下约定的方式劝说斯库特好好上学，通过让杰姆每天去给老太太读书解决他们之间的矛盾。很多时候阿迪克斯并不仅仅是在帮助孩子解决问题，他都是在寻找方法利用这些事情给孩子们上一课，教会他们如何做人、如何处世。

提到这本书，就少不了那场审判，那场“根本不应当在法庭上出现”的审判。住在垃圾场后面的尤厄尔家人指控黑人汤姆强暴了他家女儿，作为律师的阿迪克斯承担起为汤姆辩护的任务。最初斯库特向阿迪克斯问起这事儿时，阿迪克斯就坦白这是一场毫无胜算的辩护。然而最终的事实也证明了阿迪克斯的预言，尽管尤厄尔家人的证词漏洞百出、令人啼笑皆非，尽管阿迪克斯的证词慷慨激昂、说服力极强，尽管事情的真相早已在人们的心里扎根，但是陪审团在经历了可笑的六个小时的讨论后，依然给出了“汤姆有罪”的判定。

面对这场辩护，阿迪克斯明知自己必败，可还是付出了大量的时间、大量的精力去帮助黑人，以一己之力挑战整个社会。阿迪克斯和孩子们讲过，真正的勇敢就是明知做不到却又义无反顾地去做。我想阿迪克斯的这场辩护是将这句话体现到了极致。在当时那个“辩护黑鬼的人”还是句极其恶毒的骂人话的时代，阿迪克斯这样的父亲真的是太可贵了。在这场辩护中，阿迪克斯不仅仅是一个律师，他更是一个老师，他给孩子们展现了什么叫做良心。杰姆紧紧攒着栏杆流泪，我想这就是阿迪克斯的这堂人生课成功的最大证据。

唯一不能从众的，就是人的良心。

“只要你杀死了一只知更鸟，那就是在犯罪。”

孩子，我想你去保护它。

★ 杀死一只知更鸟读后感

★ 《杀死一只知更鸟》读书感悟

★ 小说杀死一只知更鸟读后感

★ 《杀死一只知更鸟》读后感作文

★ 阅读杀死一只知更鸟感想

★ 经典小说杀死一只知更鸟读后感作文

★ 小说杀死一只知更鸟读后感优秀作文

★ 读书笔记1500字

★ 边城读书笔记1500字

★ 小狗钱钱读书笔记1500字

《杀死一只知更鸟纪念版》读书笔记 第2篇

我也喜欢书中杰姆和斯库特的内心成长，他们在阿迪克斯、卡波妮、莫迪小姐的教导和影响下，渐渐建立起对周遭事物的看法，内心强大而温暖。看书过程中不止一次，我为这些人物的言行鼓掌，为他们坚持的公平、正义而感动。

一开始，我跟随斯库特的眼睛，对怪人既好奇又害怕，后来怪人阿瑟冲出来救了他们，我也对阿瑟充满了深深的感激。最后斯库特像挽着一位绅士一样挽着阿瑟，把他护送回家，书中说“我从此再也没有见过他”，我的眼泪唰地就下来了。知更鸟在书中代表着什么呢，可以是汤姆，可以是阿瑟，也可以是镇上每一个人还有良知的那个部分，杀死这样的善良，就是一种罪恶。所以阿迪克斯拼命地去为汤姆辩护，去打这一场明知道不会赢的官司，就像莫迪小姐说的那样，“只要我们往前走了一小步，那么事情就是不一样了!”

所以，不要再伤害无辜的人，要消除偏见和歧视，保护每个人心中的良善，并使它们发展壮大到，这个过程会很漫长，但只要还有人在努力，甚至不惜代价全力以赴为，那么总有一天光明最终会到来。

《杀死一只知更鸟纪念版》读书笔记 第3篇

A major trend in the 1960s, structuralism is an approach to lit erary analysis grounded in structural linguistics and the science o language, and its historical roots can be traced to the linguistic writ ings and theories of Ferdinand de Saussure, a Swiss professor in the late 19th and early 20th century.His scientific investigation in to language and language for the study of language provides the ba sis for structuralism’s unique approach to literary analysis.Sau ssure pointed out that binary oppositions are presented in linguistic structural models, such as langue and parole, diachronic and syn chronic, absolute arbitrariness and relative arbitrariness, signified and signifier, and other dichotomies.

Later, in the 1950s and 1960s, anthropologist Claude LeviStrauss was one of the first scholars/researchers to apply Sau ssure’s principles of linguistics to narrative discourse.Research ing and writing in response to Levi-Strauss was his contemporary the eminent French structuralist Roland Barthes.In his book S/Z Barthes notices minimal pairs that function in a relationship of bi nary opposition to endow the text with meaning.According to Barthes, the structuralist can decode the text, thereby explaining its meaning, by finding the binary oppositions within the text and showing how these oppositions are interrelated.

Because oppositional structures greatly determine how the reader interpret the text, the present paper applies the binary oppo sition principle to interpret the novel To Kill a Mockingbird, .semi-autobiographical work by the American female writer Harpe Lee.The unforgettable novel of a childhood in a sleepy Southern town and the crisis of conscience that rocked it, To Kill a Mocking bird became both an instant bestseller and a critical success when it was first published in 1960.It went on to win the Pulitzer Priz in 1961 and was later made into an Academy Award-winning film now also a classic.From the point of view of the protagonist Scout a six-year old child, the novel recalls the injustice of a southern town, Maycomb, in the 1930s.From six to nine years old, the pro tagonist Scout experienced many things in the town, good and bad kind and evil, among which the lawsuit about a kind and hones Black man, Tom Robinson, slandered by the white father and daughter and finally suffering a tragic death.The novel reflects th prejudice towards Black people at that time in America.Compas sionate, dramatic, and deeply moving, To Kill a Mockingbird take reader to the roots of human behavior—to innocence and experi ence, kindness and cruelty, love and hatred, humor and pathos.

2 The Analysis of Binary Oppositions

2.1 Prejudice versus Acceptance

In To kill a Mocking Bird, Aunt Alexandra is a typical repre sentative who follows the tradition of the noble White class with prejudice against Black people in the American South of the US by contrast, Scout represents a more modern or anti-traditional per son.Their attitudes to the maidservant Calpurnia, a Black woman constitute a sharp binary opposition.

As a relic of the old South, Aunt Alexandra strongly believe in the racial hierarchy and considers the Black people to be slaves even after the Civil War.Her attitude towards Calpurnia illustrates her belief:“PUT MY BAG in the front bedroom, Calpurnia, ”was the first thing Aunt Alexandra said when she first appears in the house of Atticus to stay with them“for a while” (Lee 1982:169) .Using the command tone, she draws a clear demarcation line between herself and the Black maidservant, in order to show her nobility and superiority.Besides, she always orders Calpurnia to do numerous things to show her mastership.She warns the family to be cautious of talking in front of Calpurnia, because she is a Black woman.She even tells Atticus that“You’ve got to face it sooner or later and it might as well be tonight.We don’t need her now” (Lee 1982:182) .She blames Cal for the so-called wrong behavior of the two children, so she wants her to go, but in vain.All the actions and beliefs of Aunt Alexandra are the legacy of the old tradition of prejudice, of which she is a firm defender.

Scout, however, represents a sharp contrast to Aunt Alexandra as a supporter of anti-tradition and social acceptance.Although very young, she is not influenced by older people who follow the racism against Black people.Losing her mother at the age of two, Scout has Calpurnia’s company and has“felt her tyrannical presence as long as”she could remember (Lee 1982:7) .In Scout’s eyes, “Calpurnia was something else again.She was all angles and bones;she was nearsighted;she squinted;her hand was wide as a bed slat and twice as hard.She was ordering me out of the kitchen, asking me why I couldn’t behave as well as Jem when she knew he was older, and calling me home when I wasn’t ready to come.Our battles were epic and one-sided.Calpurnia always won, mainly because Atticus always took her side” (Lee 1982:7) .Scout can describe Calpurnia vividly because she is familiar with her.She never sees Calpurnia as an inferior person because she is a Black woman from whom she would never keep a distance;instead, Scout respects Calpurnia, treating her as an important family member, even as the role of mother, to some extent.This can be proved by Atticus’s words when Aunt Alexandra wants to let Calpurnia go out of the family, who says that“I don’t think the children’ve suffered on bit from her having brought them up....she’s never let them get away with anything, she’s never indulged them the way most colored nurses do.She tried to bring them up according to her lights, and Cal’s lights are pretty good, and another thing, the children love her” (Lee 1982:183)

The binary opposition of Aunt Alexandra’s and Scout’s different attitudes towards the black woman Calpurnia shows the kindness and innocence of Scout and prejudice and antipathy of Aunt Alexandra.We have seen a lovely girl who is not contaminated by the prejudice of other people and who discovered the beauty of human nature.

2.2 Justice versus Evil

Apart from the conflict between prejudice and acceptance, there is also a tension between justice and evil, with Atticus, the righteous White lawyer, the reclusive Boo Radley and other White men of the town as the symbols of justice and evil respectively.

Boo Radley, locked in the room by his father, from the beginning of the novel, always fascinates curious children.There is a rumor in the town that he is bad and evil.However, although seldom coming out, he is the embodiment of kindness and justice and focuses the outside world in his own special way.When Scout rolls into the Radley front yard, she“had heard another sound...Someone inside the house was laughing” (Lee 1982:54) .When Miss Maudie’s house is on fire, Scout and Jem stand in front of the Radleys watching people fighting the fire and then go home finding herself clutching a brown woolen blanket she is wearing around her shoulders, squaw-fashion, but does not know who put it there.We readers, however, can discern that it is Boo, who does not help to fight the fire but helps his neighbors in his own way.Also, he sews pants for Jem and places presents in the hole of the tree to the children.Moreover, at the night when Bob Ewell tries to ambush Scout and Jem, Boo saves the children courageously.Until now, he is not a bad or evil man as the rumor goes, but rather a kind and righteous person.

Besides Boo Radley, Atticus is also a person full of the sense of justice.Regardless of the prejudice and ugly talk from other people in the town, he is going to defend Tom Robinson resolutely and determinedly.When her daughter asks him why he did it, he says that“The main one is, if I didn’t I couldn’t hold up my head in town, I couldn’t represent the county in legislature, I couldn’t even tell you or Jem not to do something again” (Lee 1982:100) .As a lawyer, he only remembers justice and evil instead of blackness or whiteness and he chooses to do the right thing at any cost.Even when he receives vicious remarks, indeed harm from other people of the town, he follows his own heart firmly and does not give up.

Along with the justice of Radley and Atticus, the evil of some White people in the town is an inseparable“friend”which cannot be ignored.After Atticus defends Tom Robinson, the evil of words or even actions towards Atticus even his children begins to emerge.Whenever Scout and Jem pass by Mrs.Dubose’s, “we would be raked by her wrathful gaze, subjected to ruthless interrogation regarding our behavior, and given a melancholy prediction on what we would amount to when we grew up.., ”Scout reflects (Lee 1982:134) .When Mrs.Dubose realizes that Atticus defends a“nigger, ”her harsh words were“your father’s no better than the niggers and trash he works for!”goes to the bottom line of the children who becomes“almost accustomed to hearing insults aimed at Atticus” (Lee 1982:135-136) .But this is the first one coming from an adult.The evil of humans blinds her eyes and she cannot see what is right and what is wrong.She even spills the harsh words to two innocent and kind children.

The evil of the White people in town towards Tom Robinson is more astounding.When Tom Robinson is still locked in jail waiting for the trial, a mob of drunken men led by Walter Cunningham come to the jail at night to force Atticus to hand over Tom but in vain, because of Atticus’noncompliance and Scout’s unintentional interference.We all know that their intention is to lynch Tom in the name of so-called dignity and justice, which, actually, is the pretext for their evil.

The evil is most thoroughly embodied by Bob Ewell.Even though he wins the lawsuit, he still bears a grudge against Atticus.He spits at and threatens Atticus and his children.Finally, he ambushes the two children on the way home at night, but dies under his own knife.His actions are not forgivable.

Justice, eventually, overcomes evil.Their binary opposition reveals human nature and suggests that evil cannot defeat justice.

2.3 Black versus White

Although the Civil War had abolished slavery, the status of Black people had not improved.Tom Robinson, a Black man, who“lives in the that little settlement beyond the town dump, ...cleanliving folks” (Lee 1982:100) .In the eyes of Scout, “Tom was a black velvet Negro, not shiny, but soft black velvet.The whites of his eyes shone in his face, and when he spoke we saw flashes of his teeth.If he had been whole, he would have been a fine specimen of a man” (Lee 1982:257) .Kind and honest, he is willing to help others.However, the Ewells represent the opposite:“No economic fluctuations changed their status--people like the Ewells lived a guests of the county in prosperity as well as in the depth of a de pression.No truant officers could keep their numerous offspring in school;no public health officer could free them from congenital de fects, various worms, and the diseases indigenous to filthy sur roundings” (Lee 1982:227) .Even though people of the town know clearly what kinds of person of Tom Robinson and Bob Ewell are Tom is still treated unfairly and becomes the victim of prejudice, al though there is strong evidence proving that Tom is slandered by the White father and daughter Ewell and Mayella.

The members of the jury represent the conflict between Black and White.With the accused Tom as a Black and the accusers a White, the members of the jury who decide the result of the lawsui are all White, which shows that racial discrimination affected the judicial system so that Blacks cannot have the opportunity to be come a member of the jury.Therefore, the result of the lawsuit i expected, which, however, is not the problem of the judicial system but, instead of racial discrimination.As a result, the White Ewell are viewed as much nobler than the kind and hardworking Robin sons.Tom speaks for himself but is buried in racial discrimination and cannot escape the fate of death.

3 Enlightenment from the Author through Binary Op-positions

Binary oppositions are not simply static juxtapositions, but al so conveying important information about the author’s ideals which include abolishing racism.

3.1 The Inherency of Black versus White

The contrast between Black and White is inherent, which can not be eliminated naturally, because both Black and White are de termined by genes.Therefore, the perceived differences between Black and White are permanent, with implications for social status.

3.2 Prejudice versus Acceptance and Justice versus Evil

Unlike Black versus White, prejudice versus acceptance and justice versus evil are not inherent.Though they originate from the former, they also emerge from many other factors.Therefore, they can be defeated through conscious efforts of human beings, which I think, is the author’s most important message.Just like the au thor says in the novel“Mockingbirds don’t do one thing but mak music for us to enjoy.They don’t eat up people’s gardens, don’nest in corncribs, they don’t do one thing but sing their hearts fo us.Why it is a sin to kill a mocking bird” (Lee 1982:119) .The au thor may conclude that if it is a sin to kill an innocent animal when the animal is a completely different species, and if we can live har moniously with mockingbirds, then this is how people should trea each other.That Blacks and Whites, indeed all races, should aban ddoonn pprreejjuuddiiccee aanndd eevviill iiss tthhee mmoosstt iimmppoorrttaanntt mmeessssaaggee ccoonnvveeyyeedd bby the author.

摘要：该文从结构主义的角度来解读哈珀·李的著作《杀死一只知更鸟》。通过分析文本中几组重要的二元对立项, 读者可以探知书中所描绘的20世纪30年代美国南方小镇的社会生活。在矛盾和冲突中, 读者感知主人公的成长历程, 以此来激发人们对社会问题及人性的思考。

关键词：结构主义,二元对立,《杀死一只知更鸟》

参考文献

[1]Barthes, Roland.Annette Lavers[M].S/Z.Trans.New York:Hill and Wang, 1972.

[2]Harper Lee.To Kill a Mockingbird[M].New York:Boston.Grand Central Publishing, 1982

[3]Li Xi-li.A Structuralist’s Look at A Streetcar Named Desire[J].Overseas English, 2014 (3) .

[4]Wang Ying-hui, Racism and Acceptance:a Clash BetweenAunt Alexandra and Scout in To Kill a Mockingbird[J].Jour-nal of Language and Literature, 2011 (8) .

[5]Wang Zhong-ling.Critique and Rethinking of Formalism andStructuralism (Part I) [J].Academic Exchange, 2011 (5) .

[6]Wang Zhong-ling.Critique and Rethinking of Formalism andStructuralism (Part II) [J].Academic Exchange, 2011 (6) .

[7]Yun De-yu.On the Female Protagoist Scot’s Growth in ToKill a Mockingbird[J].Journal of Henan Institute of Scienceand Technology, 2014 (5) .

《杀死一只知更鸟纪念版》读书笔记 第4篇

Publisher： Arrow

“Shoot all the bluejays you want， if you can hit 'em， but remember it's a sin to kill a mockingbird.”

A lawyer's advice to his children as he defends the real mockingbird of Harper Lee's classic novel - a black man charged with the rape of a white girl. Through the young eyes of Scout and Jem Finch， Harper Lee explores with exuberant humour the irrationality of adult attitudes to race and class in the Deep South of the 1930s. The conscience of a town steeped in prejudice， violence and hypocrisy is pricked by the stamina of one man's struggle for justice. But the weight of history will only tolerate so much.

To Kill a Mockingbird is a coming-of-age story， an anti-racist novel， a historical drama of the Great Depression and a sublime example of the Southern writing tradition.

“你可以射杀那些冠蓝鸦，如果你能射中，但是切记，杀死那些知更鸟是有罪的。”

这是一个律师在为哈珀·李的经典之作的真正知更鸟——一个被指控强奸白人女孩的黑人——辩护时，给他的孩子的建议。哈珀从斯格特和杰姆的视角，对上个世纪三十年代美国南方腹地成人对种族和阶级的荒唐观点进行了描述，文笔幽默诙谐。书中的小镇充满偏见、暴力和虚伪，我们的主人翁在追求正义的过程中不断与之斗争。然而历史早已注定了结局。

《杀死一只知更鸟》是一部成长小说，反种族主义小说，是关于经济大萧条的历史剧作，也是美国南方作品的代表作品。

杀死一只知更鸟读书笔记 第5篇

杰姆是一个超有灵性又正义勇敢温暖绅士的男孩子，他满足我对男孩子的一切期望，是真正的贵族，阿蒂克斯的翻版。夜黑风高的夜晚，妹妹因为沮丧和自责不愿脱下万圣节装扮，杰姆做的跟阿蒂克斯一样好，好温暖，感动的热泪盈眶，当他跟尤厄尔战斗时，我相信他不但是为了保护妹妹，也想履行那份心底的正义，但他付出了胳膊终生残疾的代价，心里很为这个优秀的男孩子可惜。

姑姑的各种标准和说教并不能迫使斯库特成为淑女，而姑姑在听说汤姆的死讯后，迅速收拾心情，继续主持其实她很厌烦的下午茶会，让斯库特瞬间觉得姑姑身高2米八，从而主动恭敬的为那些还活在历史荣耀里的南方白人贵妇呈上点心。那一刻姑姑对斯库特递过来的眼神是感激而非赞赏，瞬间也给我上了一堂家庭教育和淑女典范的双修课。

阿瑟是一个本性善良不羁的孩子，只因为镇上别人对他行为的偏见，阿瑟父母不知道用了什么办法，让热爱自由和社交的孩子从此闭门不出，被大家看成怪人，恐惧与人打交道。然而这并没有妨碍让阿瑟成为一个善良正义的人。

《杀死一只知更鸟》读书笔记 第6篇

这本书，陈述了两个故事。一是主人公斯库特，哥哥杰姆与他们的朋友迪儿一起探索怪人拉德利，因为想见他一面，而干出种种傻事，从中我看出了三个孩子的好奇与勇敢。二是父亲阿蒂克斯作为律师尽全力为无罪的黑人汤姆辩解，便白人始终判定汤姆有罪，从中我读懂了阿蒂克斯的正义与执着，还有黑人被压迫的无奈事实。

我也曾为黑人感到过不公，对啊，只是肤色不同罢了，凭什么处处受到白人的排挤与压迫呢?可见旧社会的黑暗和对黑人的种族歧视十分严重，但最令我难以忘却的，还是那贯穿整本书的.正面人物：阿蒂克斯。他与我的爸爸极为相似，每当看到阿蒂克斯对他的两个孩子教育有方、教法独特时，我便有一种亲切感流涌上心头，就好像自己的爸爸在教育我一样。

当斯库特不愿去上学，不喜欢新老师时，阿蒂克斯对她说：“你永远不可能真正了解一个人，除非你从他的角度去看问题。”当三个孩子对怪人好奇不断时，他严厉制止了孩子们的行动;当杰姆把雪人堆成邻居的形象时，他教育杰姆“不能随便给邻居塑个雕像去讽刺”;当他知道孩子们去了法庭观看时，他在孩子们的恳求下也答应让他们继续听;当别人都说他“为黑鬼帮腔”时，他没有放弃，而是毅然选择去帮助黑人，解答孩子种种问题……他就是孩子们的榜样，他用自己的行动对孩子们进行教育：不杀死一只知更鸟!不蔑视一个黑人!

而他——阿蒂克斯，也不自觉让我想到了我的爸爸，他也怀有一颗助人为乐的心。小时候的我，不懂事，不会帮助他人，觉得自己拥有了就够了，仿佛每个人活得像我这般自在。有次在大街上碰上一个乞讨老人，衣衫褴褛，他低着头，怯生生地在我小小的身板前伸出一只铁碗，双手带动着碗不住地发抖，嘴里含糊不清地好像在念叨着什么。看着老人窘迫的样子，我的心里也曾闪过一丝怜悯，但很快又消失了，剩下的只有见到陌生人向自己走来的恐慌，我愣了一下又绕开老人往前走，没想到爸爸拉住了我，我不解地望着爸爸，只见他往我的小手里塞上五元钱，要我给那位乞讨老人。我无奈地朝着老人，可始终没有把手中的钱给老人。一瞬间，我不知所措，慢慢后退。这时爸爸拉着我向前，抓着我的手往老人碗里放，一松手，钱便算给老人了。老人连声道谢，不一会儿便走开了，我正想问爸爸，他俯下身子来对我说：“别怕，大多人都是好人。”

大多数人都是好人……与阿蒂克斯对斯库特说的一样。

爸爸是名教师，他很敬业，常常也学生沟通交流，就像也我一样。我和斯库特一样有什么不懂的都人向爸爸提出，爸爸会如阿蒂克斯一样耐心解答我的问题。当我和斯库特一样犯了错时，爸爸会与阿蒂克斯一样教导我们。

其实每个人的爸爸都爱自己的子女，只是方式不同，通过此书，我还发现了父亲其实为子女付出了许多，只是没让子女知道罢了。他们一直是子女最坚强的后盾!让我们大家一起来孝敬我们的父母，感恩他们的无私奉献吧!

《杀死一只知更鸟》读书笔记 第7篇

小说以第一人称叙述来描写，展示了一个不到10岁的小女孩的视角下的梅科姆小镇发生的一连串的事情。不得不说小女孩斯库特(琼·露易丝·芬奇)是个十足十的假小子，我看了四分之一的书还以为主角是个小男孩(这不能怪我不认真看或者我脑子笨，斯库特三个字很难想象是女孩子的名字呀，而且斯库特还老是打架，也会被人揍，正常女孩子哪会这么厉害，她老是跟着她的哥哥身后玩各种男孩子玩的游戏，她还会在同学遇到困难的时候仗义执言，不像是个女孩子的所作所为)也可以看出，她的爸爸阿迪克斯对她的教育方式没有因为她是个女孩子而跟她哥哥有所不同，这让我感觉到，男孩子和女孩子是平等的，也是我羡慕的地方。

小说第一部分很平淡，主要写了小女孩的生活琐事，读书、玩耍……描写了对怪人拉德利的恐惧。第二部分才是高潮的来临，写了爸爸阿迪克斯为黑人汤姆·鲁滨逊做辩护律师发生的一系列事情。

后面部分才直白地显示了那个时期种族歧视的严重。当我读到黑人汤姆在回答对方的律师那段话时，我感受到了黑人在长期被歧视下那种无助、认命，连他们自己都认为自己在任何情况下都不会被认可的深深的无力感，很让人心痛。人生来就是有偏见的吧，小说的黑暗面很少被表现出来，最大的坏人就是鲍勃·尤厄尔了吧，最后还对他看不爽的人进行一系列的报复，真真是气死人了，明明是自己的不对，还怨到别人身上，我当时想怎么会有这么厚颜无耻的人呢!最后还想伤害两个孩子，杰姆的胳膊就是他弄伤的!!!

为什么说这本书是我看过最纯洁的小说呢。在看到小男孩迪尔和斯库特躺在一张床上，迪尔对女主说“斯库特，我们去弄个孩子来吧”，我吓了一大跳，本来男孩和女孩躺在一张床上就让我有点不舒服了，他还说出这么一句话，后来证明是我想多了。还有一段对杰姆在斯库特面前脱衣服，向斯库特展示他的胸毛和腋毛的描写，我也惊了一下，可是杰姆就是单纯想向自己的妹妹表达自己长大成人了的喜悦感呀，我真是太邪恶了。忽然发现我们小时候对性懵懵懂懂，也有点排斥，可是这是最正常不过的事情了，这是我们长大的必经之路，心里有鬼才会去避免去提及，坦坦荡荡地表达出来才是我们应该持有的态度。斯库特(一个9岁的小女孩)对迪尔的求婚十分认真，认为长大以后就一定会嫁给迪尔了，她那一本正经地提及迪尔和她未来的生活时，给她的单纯笑到了，这确实是一个可爱的小女孩，这就是小女孩眼里的爱情吧，很纯粹，很令人向往。

最让我感动的是怪人拉德利，这是一个十分完美的人在我眼里。虽然第一部分孩子因为他的足不出户产生好奇和恐惧，让我也有点怕怕的，后来读到杰姆三人去怪人拉德利的院子里探险逃跑时杰姆把裤子落在了怪人的园子，杰姆回去拿裤子时发现裤子被缝补好了，还被叠得整整齐齐地放在那里，还有两个小孩每次在拉德利门前那个树的树洞里拿到各种各样的好东西，一开始我以为这些都是爸爸所做的事情，因为斯库特说到“除非是跟你住在同一屋檐下的人，否则没人能知道你想干什么……”当时我还沾沾自喜地以为自己已经洞悉一切，读到最后才知道这是阿瑟·拉德利做的一切，以及迪莫小姐家着火那一段，等火被扑灭了之后，站在外面的斯库特发现自己身上披着毛毯，也是怪人拉德利的杰作。最后杰姆和斯库特遇袭时，也是拉德利第一时间跑出来救他们，那时我真的被感动哭了，这世界怎么会有这么善良的人，以前小孩子们不懂事，老是想着去招惹拉德利，当然都没有成功，他还把两个小孩当朋友一样保护，送他们好玩的东西，那是书里最纯净的一人了吧。

当然，梅科姆小镇里的每个人，我都觉得好善良的。虽然一开始亚力山德拉姑姑让我很讨厌，但是后面也没有这种感觉了。最最要说的是爸爸阿迪克斯对孩子们的教育，这个十分有魅力的男人，有本事从不显摆自己，深受小镇人民的爱戴，对任何人都彬彬有礼，从来不打骂孩子……我也想有一个这样的爸爸。

《杀死一只知更鸟》 第8篇

Publisher： Grand Central

The unforgettable novel of a childhood in a sleepy Southern town and the crisis of conscience that rocked it， To Kill A Mockingbird became both an instant bestseller and a critical success when it was first published in 1960. It went on to win the Pulitzer Prize in 1961 and was later made into an Academy Award-winning film， also a classic.

Compassionate， dramatic， and deeply moving， To Kill A Mockingbird takes readers to the roots of human behavior - to innocence and experience， kindness and cruelty， love and hatred， humor and pathos. Now with over 18 million copies in print and translated into forty languages， this regional story by a young Alabama woman claims universal appeal. Harper Lee always considered her book to be a simple love story. Today it is regarded as a masterpiece of American literature.

这本小说的背景是美国一个沉睡的南方小镇，讲述了有关童年及震撼整个童年的良心危机的故事，于1961年斩获普利策奖。书中的描写饱含深情，剧情跌宕起伏，直触人心，把读者直接带入人类行为的根源深处--天真与经验，善良与仁慈，爱与恨，喜悦与痛苦。但是作者哈珀·李却称该书不过是一本简单的爱情小说。今日，它已然成为美国文学的经典著作之一。

《杀死一只知更鸟》读书笔记 第9篇

最近有一款名叫《旅行青蛙》的游戏，风靡朋友圈，大家的身边可能都有这样的人：隔三差五朋友圈晒一晒蛙儿砸去哪儿玩了，又带什么礼物回来啦，怎么又在家宅一天啦，等等。

这些话怎么听着这么耳熟呢?没错，是不是跟你小时候爸妈对你说的话很像?

-你天天往蛙包里塞高级便当，帐篷也尽挑高级的买，生怕蛙在外面饿着冻着，这不就是当年你爸妈为你做的吗?

-你以为这款游戏佛性，氪金也比前两周风靡全网的《恋与制作人》便宜，当你看见别人家蛙儿砸的顶配，你开始反思是不是给你蛙儿砸的远远不够。

这款日本公司开发的小游戏通过养一只青蛙的过程，让用户体验了一把当家长带孩子的感觉。但是真的是自己的孩子，你会像游戏里一样放养吗?

《杀死一只知更鸟》这本书中，提到“知更鸟”这三个字的地方屈指可数，在阅读的过程中，可能经常会有这样的疑问：为什么书名要叫做《杀死一只知更鸟》呢?

我很佩服作者可以通过一个小女孩Scott的视角来讲述这个故事，书中描述她内心想法的天真无邪的语句，让人看了觉得仿佛真是出自一个小女孩之口。

cott的父亲，阿迪克斯，是一名律师，他年轻时还是镇上有名的神枪手。他告诉孩子们，无论你射杀多少只蓝鸟都没有关系，但是杀死一只知更鸟就是一种罪过。因为，它们不毁坏别人的花园，也不在玉米地做窝，除了专心唱歌，什么都不做。知更鸟象征着天真无辜和善良的人，当你杀死知更鸟的时候，就好像杀死无辜善良的人。它们从来都是无辜的，而人们却对其不断残害。

书中的“知更鸟”就是黑人罗宾逊，他被诬陷强奸了一名少女，没有人愿意为他辩护，只有阿迪克斯承担了这个责任，为此，镇上很多人都在背后议论阿迪克斯，甚至说他坏话。但是他相信罗宾逊，也看清楚了这起冤案中的真相，更因为他崇尚人人平等，而不会像大部分人一样仅仅因为罗宾逊的肤色而质疑他的人品。

在法庭上，阿迪克斯据理力争，循序渐进地为评审团解释了事情的真相，渴望为罗宾逊洗脱罪名。但是，法院最终的判决结果却是令人失望且悲哀的。

罗宾逊还是被判处死刑，在庭审结束的几天内企图逃跑时被击毙了。

小女孩的哥哥杰姆为此感到伤心难过，他不理解为什么真相明明如此显而易见，但是法庭却给出截然不同的判决。阿迪克斯说：

……在我们生活的这个世界上，总有什么东西让人失去理智——即使他们努力想做到公平，结果还是事与愿违……”

书中还有一段小插曲讲的是小女孩的哥哥杰姆因为发怒毁了杜博斯太太的花园，而被阿迪克斯严厉地教训一顿，并且被罚坚持一周去杜博斯太太家念书给她听。他希望让孩子们明白，什么错误可以犯，什么错误不可以犯。他总是希望以身作则，尽管平时很放任孩子们玩耍，但是当孩子们对怪人拉德利的家进行骚扰时，当孩子们因为其他人的坏话而打架时，当孩子们因为情绪失控而破坏别人花园时，他总会及时教育他们，教导他们事情的对错，教导他们如何做一个正直而且正义的人。

常有人说，父母是孩子最好的老师。并不仅仅是因为孩子在出生后到入学前的这段时间大多都是由父母照料抚养，而是因为孩子在成长的过程中，父母的言传身教，将会在孩子的心中留下不可磨灭的印迹。

最后以书中的一段话作为结尾——

《杀死一只知更鸟》读书笔记 第10篇

2.这本书一共有三次提到了知更鸟，可是我一直都不理解知更鸟跟这个文章这个故事有什么关联，百度了一下原来知更鸟在欧洲那边是有善良的寓意的，那也就是说汤姆、怪人阿德利、厨娘卡波尼等等黑人所遭受到的种族歧视、不公等现象都是在杀死善良！

3.在杀死善良这个大环境下，阿迪克斯有自己的想法，保持着善良，在一言一行的教育中熏陶两个孩子，书的最后斯库特拉着怪人阿德利的手陪他回家着实令人感动，毕竟一开始斯库特是怕他的。不仅仅是阿迪克斯和两个孩子保持着善良，还有厨娘卡波尼，她优雅、有教养、不纵容孩子的坏脾气也是让人印象深刻。

4.还让人又喜欢又感动的是两个孩子之间的相处，虽然平时有很多打打闹闹嘻嘻哈哈，但是在需要一个人谈心陪伴又不希望是大人的时候，对方显得那么重要，重点是能理解彼此，这种相亲相爱令人喜欢羡慕，这也是为什么很多人想要二胎的原因之一吧！有童年也有陪伴，最好不过了。